The Analysis of Code Mixing on Facebook Status by SMP Taman Siswa Tebing Tinggi

Authors

  • Rafika Purba STMIK Pelita Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/geneus.v10i2.2157

Keywords:

Politeness, Code Mixing, Facebook, Status, Comment

Abstract

The aim of this research was to find code mixing on facebook that posted on facebook status and comments of the students’ facebook. The facebook users often mixed their language with another language in status and comments on facebook. The objectives of this research were to find out of the use of code mixing, types of code mixing and their reasons in using code mixing on facebook status. To answer the objectives of the research, the researcher used descriptive qualitative method. The results of the data analysis showed three types of code mixing suggested by such as insertion, alternation and congruent lexicalization, appeared in Facebook. There were amounts of code mixing that had been done by facebook user or ninth class students’ SMP Taman Siswa  Tebing Tinggi were 71 for insertion, 9 times for alternation and 3 for congruent lexicalization. So, the total of code mixing that had been done by them was 83 times. So, the facebook users were dominantly used insertion than alternation and congruent lexicalization. Moreover, the reasons of doing the codes were so varieties, such as would improve their language, mixing some language was unique, could not say and forgot the word, live in bilingual environment, to make emphasize, funny, joke, and applying new words on facebook status and comments.

References

Ary, Donald, Jacobs, Lucy Cheser, Razavieh, Ashgar and Chris Sorensen. 2006. Introduction to Research in Education. Sydney: Thomson.

Asror, Muhammad Khozinatul. 2011. An Analysis Of Figurative Language On Lyrics Of Maher Zain. Pamulang: Universitas Pamulang

Bishop, L. 2007. 'A reflexive account of reusing qualitative data: beyond primary/secondary dualism', Sociological Research, Special Section on Reusing Qualitative Data, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html. On Thursday, 2nd April 2013, at. 07.45 PM

Chesteron, G.K. All Slang is Metaphor, and All Metaphor is Poetry. Chapter 16th Figure of Speech.

Dewinda, 2013. Fiction Is Very Reflection of Reality. http://dewinda.com/majas-atau-gaya-bahasa/. On, 5th August 2013, at 08.00 PM

Fussel, Susan R and Moss, Mallie M. 1998. Figurative Language in Emotional Communication. Carnegie Mellon University. http:// repository.cmu.edu/hcii/82

Gluckberg, Sam. 2001. Understanding Fogurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hancock, Beverley. 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Nottingham: Trent Focus Group.

Harnum, Jonathan. 2001. Basic Music Theory : How to Read, Write, and Understand Written Music. Miami: Sol-Ut Press.

Hornby, A.S. 2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.

Keraf, G. 1984. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia

Khodijah, Dian Siti. 2010. The Figurative Language of Nirvana’s Songs. Cirebon: IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Larson, M.L.1998. Meaning-based Translation. Lanham: University Press of America Inc

McArthur, Tom. 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

McRay, John. 1998. The Language of Poetry. London: Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-30

How to Cite

Purba, R. (2021). The Analysis of Code Mixing on Facebook Status by SMP Taman Siswa Tebing Tinggi . L’Geneus : The Journal Language Generations of Intellectual Society, 10(2), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.35335/geneus.v10i2.2157