Development of a Hybrid Learning Model to Increase Student Engagement in Foreign Language Education
Kata Kunci:
Hybrid Learning Model, Student Engagement, Foreign Language Education, Language Proficiency, Curriculum DevelopmentAbstrak
This research investigates the development and implementation of a hybrid learning model aimed at increasing student engagement in foreign language education. In response to the evolving educational landscape and the need for effective language learning strategies, this study combines online and face-to-face instruction to create a dynamic and interactive learning environment. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving a sample of 120 students divided into experimental and control groups. Quantitative data collected through pre- and post-intervention assessments demonstrated significant improvements in student engagement and language proficiency among participants in the hybrid model, with engagement scores increasing by an average of 25% and language proficiency scores rising by 18%. Qualitative insights gathered from semi-structured interviews revealed that students valued the flexibility, collaboration, and cultural exposure offered by the hybrid approach, contributing to enhanced motivation and satisfaction. These findings underscore the potential of hybrid learning to foster a more engaging and effective language education experience. The study highlights the importance of integrating technology, promoting student-centered learning, and balancing online and face-to-face instruction in curriculum development. Ultimately, this research advocates for the adoption of hybrid learning models as a transformative strategy for foreign language education, preparing students for successful communication in a globalized world.
Referensi
Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video Conference, LMS, or Messenger Application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378.
Appiah, D. B. (2015). Gamification in education: Improving elementary mathematics through engagement in hybrid learning in the classroom.
Arispe, K., & Blake, R. J. (2012). Individual factors and successful learning in a hybrid course. System, 40(4), 449–465.
Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Ballester, C. P. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms.
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18.
Campbell, M., Gibson, W., Hall, A., Richards, D., & Callery, P. (2008). Online vs. face-to-face discussion in a web-based research methods course for postgraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(5), 750–759.
Falout, J. (2012). Coping with Demotivation: EFL Learners’ Remotivation Processes. TESL-EJ, 16(3), n3.
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer.
Hall, S., & Villareal, D. (2015). The Hybrid Advantage: Graduate Student Perspectives of Hybrid Education Courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 69–80.
Harklau, L. (2000). From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 35–67.
Horwitz, E. K. (2020). Becoming a language teacher: A practical guide to second language learning and teaching. Castledown Publishers.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The three p’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10–27.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, 643–660.
Öz, H. (2015). Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Education Studies, 8(5).
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23, 269–290.
Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, 103682.
Roever, C., & Phakiti, A. (2017). Quantitative methods for second language research: A problem-solving approach. Routledge.
Ross, S. J. (2005). The impact of assessment method on foreign language proficiency growth. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 317–342.
Sercu, L. (2005). Teaching foreign languages in an intercultural world. Languages for Intercultural Communication and Education, 10, 1.
Snart, J. A. (2010). Hybrid learning: The perils and promise of blending online and face-to-face instruction in higher education. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(17–37), 25.
