College students’ perception of emojis as linguistic elements in whatsApp messages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v16i2.6805Keywords:
Emojis, Linguistic Elements, Perception, WhatsAppAbstract
In today’s digital era, emojis are widely used in online communication, yet their role remains debated. whether only as decorative symbols or as linguistic elements that convey meaning and shape interpretation. This study investigates college students’ perceptions, usage, and syntactic patterns of emojis in WhatsApp messages Using a descriptive qualitative method with questionnaires, interviews, and digital material from college students in fourth-semester of English Education students at Universitas Nias, the study finds that college students view emojis as meaningful linguistic elements rather than mere decorations. Emojis are used to supplement, replace, or reverse textual meaning, and syntactic analysis identifies four patterns of emojis with sentence: post-text, co-text, pre-text, and pro-text, demonstrating their influence on sentence structure and interpretation The results contribute to understanding emojis as part of linguistic and digital discourse and highlight their relevance to digital literacy and language education.
References
Abdullah. (2023). English syntax (2nd ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar. ISBN 978-623-387043-6
Addeo, F., D’auria, V., Esposito, V., Perrone, R., & Bottoni, G. (2023). Exploring New Digital Addictions: Developing a WhatsApp Addiction Index. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2023-2-6
Akadal, E., & Söyük, M. Z. (2022). Interpretation of emoji-only messages by message producers and receivers. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 18(1), Article 67. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.299067
Alsulaiman, R. S., & Alhojailan, A. I. (2024). Emojis as tools for learning: Understanding their pragmatic functions in EFL students’ tweets. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(12), 3916-3928. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1412.27:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Amelia, L. T. D., & Balqis, N. R. (2023). Changes in Communication Patterns in the Digital Age. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum1992
Andrade, C. (2024). Confounding by indication, confounding variables, covariates, and independent variables: Knowing what these terms mean and when to use which term. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 46(1), 78–80.
Arafah, B., & Muhammad, H. (2019). Linguistic functions of emoji in social media communication. Opción, 35(24), 558-574. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338286019:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Fifth edition. SAGE.
Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2022). Emoji, a breakthrough in contemporary communication: A literature review. Journal of Language, Literature, and Teaching (JLLTE), 4(2), 63–76.
Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1), n1.
Erle, T. M., Schmid, K., Goslar, S. H., & Martin, J. D. (2021). Emojis as social information in digital communication. Emotion, 22(7), 1529–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000992
Evans, V. (2017). The emoji code: The linguistics behind smiley faces and scaredy cats. Picador.
Ferrari, E. (2023). The study of emoji linguistic behaviour: an examination of the theses raised (and not raised) in the academic literature. Communication & Society, 115-128.
Furidha, B. W. (2023). Comprehension of the descriptive qualitative research method: A critical assessment of the literature. Acitya Wisesa: Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research, 1-8.
Gunawan, J., Marzilli, C., & Aungsuroch, Y. (2022). Online ‘chatting’ interviews: An acceptable method for qualitative data collection. Belitung Nursing Journal, 8(4), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2252
Hemame, B. . (2023). The Phenomenon of Misunderstanding: A Pragmatic Linguistic Study. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(1), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i1.4 443
Holtgraves T, Robinson C (2020) Emoji can facilitate recognition of conveyed indirect meaning. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0232361. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232361
Ike, U. K., Orji, E. C., Durunna, I. L., & Okorie, J. I. (2023). An in-depth analysis of social media application: Exploring WhatsApp’s tech stack and functionalities. International Journal of Applied Science and Mathematical Theory, 9(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijasmt.v9.no3.2023.pg1.18
Lee, C. E., Chern, H. H., & Azmir, D. A. (2023). WhatsApp Use in a Higher Education Learning Environment: Perspective of Students of a Malaysian Private University on Academic Performance and Team Effectiveness. Education Sciences, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030244
Ling, S. (2018). The golden era of Emoji: An exploration of emoji and emoji system design (Master's thesis). Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Lindawati, N., Jabu, B., & Baa, S. (2022). Students' perception on the use of WhatsApp in learning EFL during Covid-19 at a remote area. Journal of Excellence in English Language Education, 1(4), 391-398.
Lu, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). An Empirical Study on the Use of Emojis by College Students From the Perspective of Symbolic Interactionism. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(4), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.11
Maier, E. (2023). Emojis as Pictures. Ergo, 10(Wittgenstein 1966), 302–340. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.4641
Mezmir, E. A. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Overview of Data Reduction, Data Display and Interpretation. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(21), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.7176/rhss/10-21-02
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
Ou, Q. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18-28. Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture. https://doi.org/10.3968/10055
Sharma, A. (2019). A review on: Perception and its effect on judgments. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 6(4), 164-168. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2019.034
Sitinjak, V. N., Surbakti, A. A., Kristin, N., Damanik, A. A. A., & Sitohang, A. J. (2023). Structural Syntactic Analysis Of Noun Phrases In Indonesian. JURNAL BASIS, 10(1), 89-94.
Storment, J. D. (2024). Going ?? lexicon? The linguistic status of pro-text emojis. Glossa, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10449
Telaumbanua, Y. A., Telaumbanua, N. T. N., Halawa, M. D., Gulo, B., Halawa, D. M. E., & Waruwu, E. K. (2024). The Use of Emojis in Language Communication on Social Media Platforms. Journal of English Language and Education, 9(4), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i4.524
Tuckerman, J., Kaufman, J., & Danchin, M. (2020). How to use qualitative methods for health and health services research. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 56(5), 818–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14849
Udoudom, U., William, G., Igiri, A., Okon, E., & Aruku, K. (2024). Emojis And Miscommunication in Text-Based Interactions Among Nigerian Youths. Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, 3(1), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.1.15
Visser, L. E., Mustofa, M., & Elfiyanto, S. (2023). The Student's Perception of The Use of The Google Form Application for Assessment at Senior High School. Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, 8(4), 994-1004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yarman Krisman Gulo, Afore Tahir Harefa, Hidayati Daeli, Riswan Zega
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
